Legal Opinion
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. v. Woolsey & Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1996No. 94-6421PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
This is an . appeal from an order of the district court dismissing Stifel, Nicolaus & Company’s (Stifel) petition to compel arbitration under 9 U.S.C. § 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act. Stifel sought injunctive relief compelling arbitration under the Act and a stay under 28 U.S.C. § 2283 against proceedings previously initiated'by Woolsey & Company, Inc. (Woolsey) in Oklahoma state court. In dismissing the federal action, the district court held an opinion issued by the Oklahoma Court of Appeals in the prior state court proceeding was res judicata on the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Rezzonico v. H & R Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.