Legal Opinion
Rohm v. Homer
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 3, 2005No. C-04-02949 RMWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
[Re Docket No. 22]
WHYTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Shelly Rohm (“Rohm”) sued her former employer, International Laborers’ Union of North America, Local Union 270 (“Local 270”), and her former supervisors, James Homer (“Homer”) and Geraldo Esparza (“Esparza”) (collectively “defendants”) for wrongful termination of employment. Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings on Rohm’s first, second, third, fourth, and sixth causes of action. Rohm opposes the motion. The court has read the moving and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boykin v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Surnow v. BuddemeyerDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
- (PS) Collins v. XL ConstructionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Christensen v. County of KauaiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
- Krizek v. Queens Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019