Legal Opinion
Boykin v. Fenty
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 4, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1790PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint. After careful consideration of the parties’ filings, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, by Order of September 28, 2012, the Court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss, granted the plaintiffs’ motion to amend, and dismissed all but one count of the amended complaint. See Order (Sept. 28, 2012). This Opinion explains the reasoning behind that Order. 2
I.…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kingman Park Civic Association v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Hunter Ex Rel. A.H. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Redmon v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Smith v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Boykin v. FentyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.