Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Outhier

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 31, 1995No. NMCM 94 01468Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDeCICCO, Judge

I concur with the majority in affirming all of the findings of guilty except for the aggravated assault. I would affirm an assault consummated by a battery, and upon reassessment of the sentence, I would set aside the dishonorable discharge and affirm a bad-conduct discharge.

The facts in this record establish an assault consummated by a battery. This offense resulted from the appellant’s use of fraud which vitiated Seaman Avila’s consent to having his hands and feet bound and entering the water. I dissent from affirming an aggravated assault in this case for two reasons. First, the record,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. HigginsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API