Legal Opinion

Wang v. Hartunian

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 2003No. B160125PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*746Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiff Paul Wang appeals the dismissal of his action against defendant Steven Hartunian following the grant of the defendant’s SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) motion. Because we conclude that a citizen’s arrest is not protected activity under the anti-SLAPP statute, we reverse.

FACTS

In November 1998, a dispute arose between Wang and Hartunian concerning the latter’s use of a vacant lot he owned, located between his residence and the home of Wang’s mother. Wang’s mother and sisters filed a lawsuit on August 18, 2000, in an attempt to enjoin…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kesmodel v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Lefebvre v. LefebvreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Dickens v. Provedent Life & Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Johnson v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Buchanan v. MAXFIELD ENTERPRISES, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API