Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Provedent Life & Accident Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 2004No. B159815PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

INTRODUCTION

This appeal challenges the trial court’s grant of an anti-SLAPP motion 1 directed at a cause of action for malicious prosecution in a three-count lawsuit.

The case arises out of the following facts. In 1987, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (Provident) issued a disability insurance policy to David L. Dickens (Dickens). In 1992, Dickens presented a claim for total disability. Provident paid on the claim until June 1997 when, based upon its investigation, it concluded the claim was fraudulent. Two years later, the federal government indicted Dickens…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John v. Douglas County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Zucchet v. GalardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Barak v. the Quisenberry Law FirmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Lassa v. RongstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API