Legal Opinion

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 8, 1992No. 9003-01409; CA A64868PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing its action for declaratory and injunctive relief. It sought to prevent persons, including defendant Weitzman, 1 from locating themselves at 41 of its stores for the purpose of soliciting signatures on initiative petitions. It did not seek to prohibit signature-collecting activities at any other Fred Meyer store.

The trial court determined that, under State v. Cargill, 100 Or App 336, 786 P2d 208, rev allowed 310 Or 133 (1990), defendant was engaged in constitutionally protected activity and could not be prohibited from collecting signatures at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CargillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Republican Party of Texas v. DietzTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. ViglielmoHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. DameronOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API