Legal Opinion

State v. Birdsell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 1, 1957No. 43322PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Justice.

The defendant, Dale E. Birdsell, was charged by bill of information, tried and convicted for the violation of Title 40, Sec. 962, Subd. B of the LSA-Revised Statutes, which reads as follows:

“It is unlawful for any person, except a dealer in surgic.al instruments, apothecary, dentist, veterinarian or nurse, attendant or intern of a hospital, sanatorium or institution in which persons are treated for disability or disease, at any time to have or possess a hypodermic syringe or needle unless such possession be authorized by the prescription or the certificate of a physician issued…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  3. State v. GebbiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  4. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. State v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. State v. BirdsellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. State v. RoufaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  4. State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API