Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Bruno

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 24, 1969No. 49298, 49299PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

Defendant, Steve Bruno, prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of the trial court revoking the suspension of the two concur*671rent ten year sentences imposed upon him when he pleaded guilty to two charges of being a narcotic addict for violating the conditions of his probation, claiming L.R.S. 40 :962 and 40:961 upon which he was prosecuted and convicted are unconstitutional.

Bruno was charged in two identical bills of information on September 21, 19591 with the violation of L.R.S. 40:961 and 40 962 (the dates of the offense only differed) in that he “within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Blouin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  3. State v. BirdsellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. State ex rel. Hayes v. AllgoodDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. State v. HaynesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  3. State v. RosteetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  4. State v. BerryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Bruno v. LouisianaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API