Legal Opinion

State v. Birdsell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 27, 1958No. 43736PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Defendant Dale E. Birdsell was charged with violating a provision of the Louisiana Uniform Narcotic Drug Act. The bill of information avers that he “ * * * feloniously violated Title 40, Section 962, Subsection B of the Louisiana Revised Statutes in that he had or possessed a hypodermic syringe and needle, contrary to the form of the Statute of the State of Louisiana * * * ”. From his conviction and sentence to a term of imprisonment at hard labor he has appealed.

For reversal of his conviction appellant cites four alleged errors committed in the court below, all of which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. LabatSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. State v. RugeroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. MadrigalIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. City of Shreveport v. CurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. Capuchino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API