State v. Birdsell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAWTHORNE, Justice.
Defendant Dale E. Birdsell was charged with violating a provision of the Louisiana Uniform Narcotic Drug Act. The bill of information avers that he “ * * * feloniously violated Title 40, Section 962, Subsection B of the Louisiana Revised Statutes in that he had or possessed a hypodermic syringe and needle, contrary to the form of the Statute of the State of Louisiana * * * ”. From his conviction and sentence to a term of imprisonment at hard labor he has appealed.
For reversal of his conviction appellant cites four alleged errors committed in the court below, all of which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. LabatSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- State v. RugeroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. MadrigalIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- City of Shreveport v. CurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Capuchino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.