Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1993No. 90CR0219, 910691M CA A70710 (Control), CA A70711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from four misdemeanor convictions for issuing false financial statements. Imposition of sentence was suspended on all four convictions, and defendant was placed on probation. He was ordered to serve jail time as a condition of probation for each conviction.

Two of the convictions were based on misconduct that occurred after November 1, 1989, but before June 10, 1991. During that time, the statute in effect did not authorize jail time as a condition of probation. State v. Wold, supra n 2, 105 Or App at 160. In 1991, the legislature amended ORS 137.540(2) to allow jail time as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edward E. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. State v. SwartzendruberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API