Legal Opinion

State v. McIntosh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 1993No. 448616-9107; CA A74175PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of disorderly conduct and assault in the fourth degree. ORS 166.025; ORS 163.160. He argues that the trial erred in finding that the prosecutor’s peremptory challenge of a prospective juror, who is a member of a racial minority, did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He also argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him.

This is a companion case to State v. Millage, 125 Or App 92, 864 P2d 868 (1993). Defendants’ cases were consolidated for trial, but not on appeal. In Millage, we held that the prosecutor’s peremptory challenge of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MillageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MillageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API