Legal Opinion

State v. Swartzendruber

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 2, 1993No. GA91-0019; CA A71550PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

The primary issue in this case is whether evidence seized in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution may be considered in a sentencing hearing. We have previously held that it may. State v. Campbell, 43 Or App 979, 607 P2d 745 (1979). In the light of State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Rogers, 314 Or 114, 836 P2d 127 (1992), we now hold that it may not.

In Benton County, defendant was convicted of knowingly setting sight bait 1 within 15 feet of a leghold trap for carnivores, a class A misdemeanor. ORS 496.992(1); OAR 635-50-045(7) (g) , 2 At sentencing, the state presented…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. KostaOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. NettlesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  2. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. T.M.M. v. Lake Oswego School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API