Commonwealth v. Keene
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentFord Elliott, Judge
Under the facts and circumstances of this case, I, like the majority, believe Keene’s driving record warrants the penalties imposed by 75 Pa.C.SA. 1543(b). However, I am precluded from joining the majority opinion as I believe it conflicts with Commonwealth v. Taylor, 390 Pa.Super. 571, 568 A.2d 1320 (1990). Further, because my reading of Taylor and its predecessor Commonwealth v. Nuno, 385 Pa.Super. 6, 559 A.2d 949 (1989), leads me to conclude that they, too, are in conflict, I am constrained to disagree with the majority and therefore respectfully dissent.
I reiterate the relevant facts in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RosenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993