Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1990No. 00105PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for new trial and in arrest of judgment. Appellant contends, among other things, that he was wrongfully convicted of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1543(b), which prohibits driving while under suspension for a DUI, or DUI related offense. Appellant also challenges notice of suspension. We agree with appellant that, within reasonable bounds of statutory construction, appellant was found driving under suspension for being a habitual offender and not under suspension as a condition of acceptance of ARD for a violation of section 3731. Thus,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. DarushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. HeckmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. RosenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. KeeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API