Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Robert Rude and Harold Rudolph are shareholders and former directors of Cook Inlet Region, Inc. (CIRI). They distributed a joint proxy solicitation in an attempt to be elected to the CIRI board of directors at CIRI’s 2010 annual meeting. Rude and Rudolph accumulated over one quarter of the total outstanding votes, but CIRI’s Inspector of Election refused to allow them to cumulate their votes. Thus, their votes were split evenly between the two of them and neither was seated. We conclude that the language of this proxy form required the shareholders’ votes…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richard Weiss, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Regal Collections Lancer Investments, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Blasius Industries, Inc. v. Atlas Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1988
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- A.H. v. W.P.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marshall v. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Austin Ahmasuk v. Division of Banking and SecuritiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Marshall v. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Specter v. Rainbow King Lodge, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2021