Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hollman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1929No. Docket No. 6859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

Plaintiff first obtained a money judgment against John E. Hamilton and others. An execution upon said judgment was issued against the property of said Hamilton and levied upon an automobile which was registered in Hamilton’s name. Defendant Eleanore Hollman, who is now Hamilton’s wife, filed a third-party claim with the sheriff and a bond under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure, sections 710 and 710%. The sheriff released and delivered the car to her. Plaintiff then brought this action against the sheriff, joining Mrs. Hollman and the Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, the surety on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Moody v. GoodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Pendell v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Crandall v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lane v. Volunteer Co-operative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. FelicianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. True v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Mueseler v. BridgewaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Jackson v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API