Mueseler v. Bridgewater
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff had judgment against the defendants in the sum of $2,500 and costs for and on account of the alleged wrongful conversion of a certain Packard automobile. From this judgment the defendants appeal, and bring this cause before us upon the judgment-roll alone.
The findings of the court are to the effect that on or about the nineteenth day of May, 1930, the plaintiff purchased from Carl R. Henderson a Packard sedan automobile, paying therefor the sum of $2,287.50; that the plaintiff being incapacitated, by reason of physical infirmities, from driving an automobile, and also from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Sidney v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Pendell v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HollmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carpenter v. DevittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942