Eli Lilly and Co. v. Biffle
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRIS, Justice.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion to seal certain documents pursuant to rule 76a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellants assert four points of error. Because we find merit in appellants’ first point of error, we address it only and reverse the trial court’s order. Setting forth the procedure to be followed under rule 76a, we remand the cause to the trial court for a new hearing on appellants’ motion.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1
Appellees sued appellants on a products liability theory relating to the drug Prozac and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Upjohn Co. v. Freeman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
3Cited by13 opinions
- General Tire, Inc. v. KeppleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Beedy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Wood v. James R. Moriarty, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Cortez v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- BP Products North America, Inc. v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.