Legal Opinion

Cortez v. Johnston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 4, 2012No. 06-11-00089-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

Carlos Cortez has appealed an order of a trial court determining that certain docu*470ments presented to and file stamped by the District Clerk of Dallas County are “court records” as defined in Rule 76a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.1

The controversy over these documents has its genesis in a dispute between Cortez and Coyt Randal (Randy) Johnston, the named defendant in the suit from which this appeal is being prosecuted. This is not this Court’s first exposure to the dispute between Cortez and Johnston. Cortez, a Dallas County district judge, had brought…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. JoachimTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Patterson v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of RegentsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Scott & White Memorial Hospital v. SchexniderTexas Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Francesca Scanio Stacey v. Selina Shadd, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020
  2. In Re Parent's Choice, LLC v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2025
  3. Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward L. Bravenec and 1216 West Ave., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  4. Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward L. Bravenec and 1216 West Ave., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  5. Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward L. Bravenec and 1216 West Ave., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API