Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pozonsky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 2018No. 2195 DD3; No. 123 DB 2015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUSTICE TODD1

In this matter, we consider the request of Petitioner, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”), to disbar Respondent, Paul Michael Pozonsky, from the practice of law in this Commonwealth. Pozonsky was a commissioned judge of the Court of Common- Pleas of Washington County who presided over criminal- trials, juvenile delinquency hearings, • and also directed the rehabilitative disposition of drug offenders in that county’s Drug Court, which he founded. Using his position as a jurist, he-directed police officers and court personnel to bring cocaine, which was evidence in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EilbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Com. v. Urwin, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Myers, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. Urwin, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Leonard, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Slatoff, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API