Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Quigley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 20, 2017No. 30 DB 2015; No. 2262 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Attorney Registration No. 37440 (Monroe)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*802OPINION
JUSTICE MUNDY
-Respondent, Peter James Quigley, has filed exceptions to the Report and Recommendation by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (the Board) recommending his disbarment. For the reasons that follow, we adopt the recommendation of the Board and order Respondent’s disbarment.
' On February 20, 2015, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed a petition for discipline alleging Quigley violated the Rules of Professional Conduct by mishandling the funds of five clients. On July 9, 2015, a three-member Hearing Committee held a disciplinary hearing, prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KneppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ODC v. Jonathan F. AltmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PozonskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018