Legal Opinion
Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Minneapolis Metropolitan Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 4, 1966No. 39415, 39435PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Minneapolis Metropolitan Company appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial; J. T. Miller Company and Joe Williams Catering Company appeal from the same order which also denied their motion for entry of judgment.
Pursuant to the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minn. St. 462.415, et seq., the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the city of Minneapolis was granted the power to plan and carry out redevelopment projects in Minneapolis. The plan affecting appellants and known as the “Lower Loop Urban Renewal Plan, Minn. R-2” was adopted by the Authority…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co. v. BrunswickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First American National Bank v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Regents of the University of Minnesota v. HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State ex rel. Head v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972