Cummins v. Donley
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wertz, J.:
This is an action to recover damages for malpractice. Defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition on the ground that it did not state facts- sufficient to constitute a cause of action was overruled and defendant appeals. Plaintiff, for her first cause of action, alleges that defendant is a practicing osteopathic physician; that in May, 1948, she employed defendant in his professional capacity as an osteopathic physician to treat her, and after an examination defendant diagnosed her illness as being caused by a defective, diseased and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Waddell v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Corley v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Stuckey v. ShultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Lamb v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Avey v. St. Francis Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Yeates v. HarmsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.