Legal Opinion
Reinsdorf v. Skechers U.S.A.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 6, 2013No. Case No. CV 10-07181 DDP (SSx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTIONS IN LI-MINE, AND OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
[Dkt. No. 198]
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
Presently before the court is Defendant Skechers U.S.A. (“Skechers”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Having considered the submissions of the parties and heard oral argument, the court grants the motion in part, denies the motion in part, and adopts the following amended order.1
*870I. Background
As explained in this court’s earlier order denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Skechers is a shoe company. (Declaration of Robert Welsh in support of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Enborg v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- In re Crash of Aircraft N93PC on July 7, 2013, at Soldotna, AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- In re Crash of Aircraft N93PC on July 7, 2013, at Soldotna, AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- In re Telescopes Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.