Legal Opinion
ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 8, 2023No. 3:21-cv-01305Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 IMPRIMISRX, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 13 MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY (ECF No. 166); 14 OSRX, INC.; OCULAR SCIENCE, INC., 15 Defendants. AND 16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT 17 TESTIMONY (ECF No. 174) 18 19 20 Before the Court are two Daubert motions by the parties to exclude expert testimony. 21 (ECF Nos. 166, 174.) Defendants OSRX, Inc. and Ocular Science, Inc. filed a Daubert 22 motion to exclude Plaintiff’s four proposed…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.