Legal Opinion

United States v. Akinyoyenu

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 4, 2016No. Criminal No. 2015-0042PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge

For many years, Defendant Titilayo Aki-nyoyenu, a pharmacist, ran a local drugstore in Washington, D.C. Following the turn of the century, he set up a website for his business, where he displayed and sold sundry medications. The Government criminally charged Defendant in 2015 because one of his products was Fioricet—a drug that contained butalbital and was therefore allegedly a controlled substance. The Indictment included, inter alia, two Controlled Substances Act offenses relating to the distribution of Fioricet without a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. James D Noland, Jr., et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  2. United States v. HorvathDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  3. United States v. MichaelDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2017
  4. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  5. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API