Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. James D Noland, Jr., et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 24, 2026No. 2:20-cv-00047Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Federal Trade Commission, No. CV-20-00047-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 James D Noland, Jr., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This case was filed on January 8, 2020 (Doc. 1) and terminated on September 18, 16 2023 (Docs. 593, 596). The Individual Defendants appealed, challenging only certain 17 aspects of the relief, and on November 24, 2025, the Ninth Circuit affirmed. (Doc. 617-1.) 18 The mandate has now issued. (Doc. 617.) 19 On March 2, 2026, the Individual Defendants filed a Rule 60(b) motion. (Doc.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. In Re: Boston's Children FirstCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. AkinyoyenuDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API