United States v. Michael
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Charles R. Simpson III, Senior Judge
This matter is before the court on motion of the defendants, Philip E. Michael, II (“Michael”) and Meds 2 Go Express Pharmacy, Inc. (“Meds 2 Go”), to dismiss Count 1 of the Second Superseding Indictment (“SSI”) charging them with knowingly and intentionally conspiring to unlawfully distribute and dispense controlled *847substances.1,2 The defendants have moved to dismiss these counts for insufficiency of the indictment, citing Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 177, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974) and Russell v. United States, 369…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.