Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 15, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16CR-101-CRSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Charles R. Simpson III, Senior Judge

This matter is before the court on motion of the defendants, Philip E. Michael, II (“Michael”) and Meds 2 Go Express Pharmacy, Inc. (“Meds 2 Go”), to dismiss Count 1 of the Second Superseding Indictment (“SSI”) charging them with knowingly and intentionally conspiring to unlawfully distribute and dispense controlled *847substances.1,2 The defendants have moved to dismiss these counts for insufficiency of the indictment, citing Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 177, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974) and Russell v. United States, 369…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API