Legal Opinion

Eastport Associates v. City of Los Angeles (In Re Eastport Associates)

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 20, 1990No. CV 89-4364 TJH, CV 89-3269 TJH, Bankruptcy No. LA 87-5367 AMG, Adv. No. LA 87-2413 BRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATTER, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

Summary of Pacts

Eastport Associates (“Eastport”) is a California limited partnership, currently in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which owns approximately 1,500 acres of undeveloped land in the Santa Monica Mountains area of Los Angeles.

In June, 1978, the City of Los Angeles (“the City”) approved a change of zone, Ordinance No. 151,208, to permit a 500-unit subdivision on the property. One of the many conditions on the change of zone was a restriction on development over 300 units until a secondary access road was provided over land owned by the County of Los…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Edward Ashton v. Kenneth CoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Rupp & Bowman Co., Debtor. Eugene Schuster v. Jeffrey H. Mims, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,021 in Re Eastport Associates, Debtor (Two Cases). Eastport Associates v. City of Los Angeles, Eastport Associates v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Eastport Associates v. City of Los Angeles (In re Eastport Associates)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. PVI Associates v. Redevelopment Authority (In Re PVI Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. In re Indian Wells Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API