Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Rupp & Bowman Co., Debtor. Eugene Schuster v. Jeffrey H. Mims, Trustee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 8, 1997No. 96-11271PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Quest Biotechnology, Inc., Eugene Schuster, and Venture Funding, Ltd. (collectively, the “Schuster Parties”), appeal the district court’s denial of motions for mandatory ab stention and a stay with respect to a bankruptcy court proceeding involving the Rupp & Bowman Co. (the “Debtor”). We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
I
This action stems from a 1986 transaction between the Schuster Parties and the Debtor in connection with a Chapter 11 proceeding involving AM Diagnostics (“AMD”). The Schuster Parties and the Debtor were involved in bringing AMD out…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Christo v. PadgettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Edge Petroleum Operating Co. v. GPR Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Tarrant Regional Water District v. SevenoaksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- E.S. Bankest, LLC v. United Beverage Florida, LLC (In Re United Container LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2002
- MT. McKINLEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CORNING INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.