Legal Opinion
Eastport Associates v. City of Los Angeles (In re Eastport Associates)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 14, 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Eastport Associates (“Eastport”) filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. In the course of the bankruptcy proceeding, Eastport initiated an adversary proceeding against the City of Los Angeles (“the City”) seeking declaratory relief on the issue of whether California law entitled it to an extension of time for final approval of a subdivision proposal. The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment to Eastport. The district court reversed and directed the bankruptcy court to dismiss Eastport’s action. The district court, in a separate decision, also…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Asousa Partnership v. Pinnacle Foods, Inc. (In Re Asousa Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Millsaps v. United States (In Re Millsaps)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
- Schulman v. California (In re Lazar)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Asousa Partnership v. Pinnacle Foods, Inc. (In Re Asousa Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,021 in Re Eastport Associates, Debtor (Two Cases). Eastport Associates v. City of Los Angeles, Eastport Associates v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.