Legal Opinion
In re Indian Wells Estates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1996No. 95-55000Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
96 F.3d 1451
78 A.F.T.R.2d 96-6465, 96-2 USTC P 50,521
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re INDIAN WELLS ESTATES, INC., a California corporation;
Indian Mountain Meadows, Inc., a California corporation;
KEM, Inc., a California corporation; VEK, Inc., a
California corporation, Debtors.
David A. GILL, Chapter 11 Trustee; Committee of Creditors
Holding Unsecured Claims,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor. Alan WRIGHT, Creditor-Appellee, v. Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Bonner Mall Partnership, Debtor. Bonner Mall Partnership v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Joseph F. Purcell, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.