Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Citizens Industrial Bank of Austin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1935No. 8131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellee, Citizens Industrial Bank, sued appellant Richard Schmidt as maker, and appellants Walter Schmidt and Joseph P. Byrne, Jr., as comakers on their promissory note for $275, payable to appellee, and for $40 attorney’s fees and interest. Richard Schmidt answered that the note provided for interest in excess of 10 per cent, per annum, and was therefore void as being a contract for usurious interest and could not furnish any proper basis for a suit upon the note. That appellee was incorporated under the provisions of articles 542 to 548, R.S. 1925; and that the whole…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Bond v. Terrell Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Graham & Locke Investments, Inc. v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Graham & Locke Investments, Inc. v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API