People v. Miller
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND DECISION IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(b) -
I. SUMMARY
While serving as a shareholder and director of his family's corporation, Respondent violated rules governing conflicts of interest by acting both as counsel to the corporation and as an interested party in two interested transactions. Respondent did not obtain the necessary consent from the corporation to enter into the transactions but rather concealed them from the board of directors in order to obtain a personal benefit. Given the facts and cireum-stances of this case, the Hearing Board concludes that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- In Re RosenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- In re Attorney F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Vikman v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 1269Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.