Legal Opinion

Yamamoto v. Premier Insurance

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1983No. 8506; CIVIL NO. 56639PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HEEN, J.

Plaintiffs Mitsuo Yamamoto (Mr. Yamamoto) and Kimiye Yamamoto (Mrs. Yamamoto) appeal from a nunc pro tunc summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Premier Insurance Company (Premier), 1 contending that the court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment to Premier. We reverse.

On December 30, 1976, Mr. Yamamoto suffered severe injuries in an automobile collision with a vehicle driven by defendant George Makuaole (Makuaole). Mr. Yamamoto was driving one of three vehicles owned by him, all of which were insured by Premier under one policy covering…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Towse v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Fitzgerald v. Meissner & Hicks, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Abraham v. S. E. Onorato GaragesHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nishi v. HartwellHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Palisbo v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Romero v. ByersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wong v. PanisHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Haas v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Blackburn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API