Legal Opinion

Haas v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1985No. 56,896PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is an interlocutory appeal in a tort action arising out of an automobile accident between Harlan A. Haas, plaintiff-appellant, and Mark S. Freeman, defendant-appellee. Horace Mann Insurance Company, appellant’s insurer, was joined as a party defendant under the underinsured motorist provision of K.S.A. 40-284. The trial court dismissed the insurance company to prevent the potential jury prejudice of having an insurance company as a named party but ruled the insurance company would be bound by any judgment rendered.

On January 5, 1982, at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Vaughn v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Connolly v. Royal Globe InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Tidmore v. FullmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. City of Mound Bayou v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Fisher v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fisher v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API