Legal Opinion
Romero v. Byers
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1994No. 20441, 20640 and 20794PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
This is a consolidated appeal arising from our grant of certiorari (No. 20,441), and acceptance of a related question certified from the Court of Appeals (No. 20,640), in the case of Romero v. Byers; and our acceptance of two questions certified to us from the United States District Court, District of New Mexico, in Sears v. Nissan (No. 20,794).
In Romero, we consider whether New Mexico should recognize a claim for loss of spousal consortium. We hold that the time has come for New Mexico to recognize that claim. On certiorari in No. 20,441, we reverse the Court of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Borer v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Herrera Ex Rel. Estate of Ruiz v. Quality PontiacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Giuliani v. GuilerKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Beverly Haceesa, Individually, and First Financial Trust Company, as Conservator for Shenoel Haceesa, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Davis v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Fernandez v. Walgreen Hastings Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.