Neigel v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, Acting P. J.
Petitioner, a police officer of the City of San Bernardino, was elected to the governing board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District. The question posed by this proceeding is whether a policeman is a “person holding a salaried office” of the city within the meaning of section 225 of the city charter (hereafter section 225) declaring that a person holding such office who accepts any other governmental office described in the section shall be deemed to have vacated the office held under city government.
Petitioner .filed an action for declaratoiy relief in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Walker v. BusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Noble v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gaines v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- California Attorney General Opinion 23-1101, California Attorney General Reports2024
- Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998
- Opinion No. (1999), California Attorney General Reports1999
- Opinion No. (2004), California Attorney General Reports2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.