Legal Opinion

Rosenson v. Bochenek

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 5, 1927Published

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit for specific performance to compel the defendant to accept a house and lot in the city of Linden.

The contract provides that premises are to be conveyed by warranty deed free from all encumbrances, with the exception of an encroachment of a small shed.

Defendant caused a survey to be made, and found that the main building encroached several inches on the adjoining property, which encroachment was admitted. Complainant thereupon purchased a strip of land running along the premises in question, and covering the ground upon which the building encroached, and tendered a new deed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kohlrepp v. RamNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  2. Doutney v. LambieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Ten Eyck v. ManningNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1893
  4. Sharpe v. StretchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  5. Franklin v. CrethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API