Franklin v. Creth
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was. delivered by
Kays, J.
The bill in this case was filed for the- purpose of relieving the complainant from the operation of a restriction contained in a deed originally made by the defendants, convey ing a certain lot in Ocean City, which, lot was subsequently conveyed to the complainant.
The decree advised by the vice-chancellor nullifies a restrictive covenant in deed made by Anna C. Creth and Elizabeth E. Creth, the defendants, to Sarah W. Liggett, dated September 20th, 1906, and conveying a lot designated as "number 867 in section C on a plan of lots of Ocean City…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Casriel v. KingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Sharpe v. StretchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- The Century Indemnity Co. v. NorbutNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Rosenson v. BochenekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927