Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Creth

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was. delivered by

Kays, J.

The bill in this case was filed for the- purpose of relieving the complainant from the operation of a restriction contained in a deed originally made by the defendants, convey ing a certain lot in Ocean City, which, lot was subsequently conveyed to the complainant.

The decree advised by the vice-chancellor nullifies a restrictive covenant in deed made by Anna C. Creth and Elizabeth E. Creth, the defendants, to Sarah W. Liggett, dated September 20th, 1906, and conveying a lot designated as "number 867 in section C on a plan of lots of Ocean City…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Casriel v. KingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  2. Sharpe v. StretchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  3. The Century Indemnity Co. v. NorbutNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  4. Rosenson v. BochenekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API