Legal Opinion

Ten Eyck v. Manning

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answer and proofs taken orally.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

This is a suit for specific performance. The material facts may be stated in a few words. On the 12th day of December, 1890, the parties made a written contract, by which the complainant agreed to well and sufficiently convey to the defendant, by deed of warranty, free from all encumbrance except a mortgage debt of $4,000, certain lands in Middlesex county; and the defendant agreed that he would, as the consideration for the complainant’s conveyance, well and sufficiently convey to the complainant, free from all encumbrance except a mortgage debt of $3,500, a farm in Somerset…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duvall v. MyersHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1850
  2. Luse v. DeitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Beard v. LinthicumHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1848

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Volk v. Atlantic Acceptance Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Centex Homes Corp. v. BoagNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Gottlaub v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  4. Soloman v. . Sewerage CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Hildinger v. BishopNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API