Legal Opinion

Budd v. Multnomah Street Railway Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah. County.

1Opinion of the CourtSteahan, J.

This is the second appeal in this action. The opinion of the court on the former appeal is reported in 12 Or. 271. After the cause had been remanded, an answer was filed *414and issues of fact duly formed. Upon a trial which was had before the court without a jury, the following facts were found: —

“1. That the defendant, the Multnomah Street Railway Company, was organized by the filing of articles of incorporation in the office of the county clerk of Multnomah County, and in the office of the secretary of State, on the fourteenth day of July, 1882, and that D. E. Budd thereafter, on the twentieth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayor of Hudson v. ThorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  2. People ex rel. Stewart v. Young Men's Father Matthew Total Abstinence Benevolent Society No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Stokes v. The Corporation of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Judah v. American Live Stock InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Budd v. Multnomah Street Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Elderkin v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Yamaha Store of Bend, Oregon, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. McCulloch v. Price Waterhouse LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Weber v. Della Mountain Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API