Legal Opinion

Elderkin v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1894No. 1099PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

— The respondent was appointed receiver of the Seattle Insurance Company by the superior court of King county, and as such receiver was directed by said court to collect from the subscribers and stockholders of said corporation the whole of their subscriptions to the capital stock of the company. Thereafter the respondent instituted this action to recover the sum of §38,829.33, alleged to be due from the appellant as the unpaid balance on the capital stock of the company held and owned by appellant at the time of the commencement of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Hughes v. Antietam Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  4. Lake Ontario, Auburn & New-York Railroad v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  5. Dayton v. . BorstNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Johnson v. J. C. HeitmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Adamant Manufacturing Co. of America v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Cox v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Halverson v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API