Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Exodus Transit & Storage Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1999PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Kathryn R. Buckley, asks us to determine whether she met her burden of proof at trial in an action against Appellee, Exodus Transit & Storage Corporation (“Exodus”), a subsequent bailee, for damage to her goods, upon a showing that her goods were originally delivered to Ryan & Christie, a prior bailee, in good condition and later returned by Exodus in damaged condition. Appellant also asks us to determine whether Exodus should be regarded as an absolute insurer of her goods and thereby responsible for all of the damage to her goods, whenever it occurred, because…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Davis v. Berwind Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Miller v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Robertson v. Atlantic Richfield Petroleum Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Wilson v. Transport Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Grossi v. Travelers Personal Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. J.W.S. Delavau, Inc. v. Eastern America Transport & Warehousing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API