Legal Opinion
In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 17, 2007No. Master File No. 1:00-1898, MDL No. 1358 (SAS), No. M21-88PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
[BJecause “law is an instrument of governance rather than a hymn to intellectual beauty, some consideration must be given to practicalities.” 1
Following the May 2007 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in People of the State of California v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et al. and The State of New Hampshire v. Amerada Hess Corporation, et al., 2 defendants in the above-captioned distinct but related action (“the Suffolk County action”), having removed this case to federal court in 2004, now move to remand the action…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- CONNECTU LLC v. ZuckerbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Schmidt v. Pennymac Loan Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (" Mtbe") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Blackrock Balanced Capital Portfolio v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.