Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Pennymac Loan Services, LLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 20, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-14728PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT PENNYMAC’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND REMANDING THE CASE TO THE SAGINAW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.
On October 9, 2014, Plaintiff Tamika Schmidt filed suit against Defendants PennyMac Loan Services, LLC, and Bank of America, NA in connection with the foreclosure of her residence. Specifically, Schmidt claimed that PennyMac violated Regulation X’s continuity of contract requirements, 12 C.F.R. § 1024.40 promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vance v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2018
- Bryant v. Hope Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2020
- Carter v. CrossCountry Mortgage, Inc., an Ohio CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- City of Cleveland v. Shaker Heights Apartments Owner, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee v. BFI Waste Systems of Tennessee, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.