Legal Opinion

Behrmann v. Phototron Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1990No. 18790PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellee, Patricia Behrmann, was awarded damages of $94,400 by a jury on her “complaint of discrimination.” She had sued defendant-appellant, Phototron Corporation, alleging that she was wrongfully terminated from her job as a salesperson because she became pregnant. Appellee claimed that appellant violated applicable portions of NMSA 1978, Sections 28-1-1 to -7, 28-1-9 to -14 (Repl.Pamp.1987), the “Human Rights Act” (the Act). She worked for appellant as a marketing and service representative from September 1982 through November 16, 1984. She learned on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Perrin v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Smith v. FDC Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Denny v. Hutchinson Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Trujillo v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bourgeous v. Horizon Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. RileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API