Legal Opinion
Denny v. Hutchinson Sales Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1981No. 79-1494PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Phyllis Denny and intervenors appeal the district court’s judgment pursuant to a jury verdict that defendant Hutchinson Sales Corporation (Hutchinson) did not discriminate against them in the sale of housing under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982 and 3604.
Hutchinson asserts that the district court had no jurisdiction over either the section 1982 or section 3604 claims because substantially equal state remedies were available. Alternatively, it argues the section 3604 claim was not timely filed. Because we find the court had jurisdiction over the section 1982 claim, we consider Denny’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Geraldine v. Carter v. Duncan-Huggins, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Guides, Ltd. v. Yarmouth Group Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Jenkins v. Whittaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Perrin v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Rosalyn Asbury v. Leo Brougham, an Individual and D/B/A Brougham Estates and Brougham Management Company, and Wanda Chauvin, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.