Legal Opinion

Huck v. Rathjen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1924No. Civ. No. 2753PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an election contest instituted under the provisions of section 1111 of the Code of Civil Procedure to determine whether the plaintiff or the defendant was elected to the office of director of an irrigation district organized under the provisions of the California Irrigation District Act. (Stats. 1897, p. 254, and amendments thereto.) The defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was entered in favor of defendant for costs. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.

The parties are agreed that the only question raised by the appeal is whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Potter v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McGregor v. Bd. of Trs. of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hertle v. BallIdaho Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wood v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cummings v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Castle Rural County Fire Protection District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API